Regional economic tightness from rural to urban regions
Regional economies are characterized by networks of interactions between individual elements and are thus quintessential complex systems. Analyzing the relatedness of various aspects of regional economies, such as exports, industries, occupations, and technologies, using methods from complexity scie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urban transformations 2022-11, Vol.4 (1), p.1-18, Article 15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Regional economies are characterized by networks of interactions between individual elements and are thus quintessential complex systems. Analyzing the relatedness of various aspects of regional economies, such as exports, industries, occupations, and technologies, using methods from complexity science is becoming commonplace. However, current work has focused nearly exclusively on regional economic complexity of more urbanized regions within countries, if not entire countries themselves. Smaller urban areas are typically over-looked and rural regions are almost entirely absent from the dialog. This paper seeks to fill this gap by examining smaller urban areas and rural regions from a complexity economics perspective. Analyzing cross-sectional data provides initial insights into the transformation of regional economic connectedness from rural to urban regions. Using a previously developed metric of economic connectivity based the on co-occurrence of economic activities, called tightness, we examine the skills space and industry space of metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural regions in the United States. We find that the least and the most urbanized regions have the highest tightness, and that this is partially due to the share of specialty skills in a “socio-cognitive” lobe of skills space. However, we also find that the composition of skills in the least and most urbanized regions differs markedly. Findings suggest that planners seeking to increase the share of socio-cognitive skills in the local workforce may be constrained by population size, and that regions of moderate population size may be required to first grow industries that require less cognitive skills.
Science Highlights
• Regional economic tightness and regional
economic output are positively correlated, even when controlling for regional
population.
• Skills tightness is greatest in the least
populous and most populous regions while industry tightness is greatest in the
most populous regions.
• Higher skills tightness is driven partially by
the share of socio-cognitive skills in the regional workforce.
• The most rural and most urban counties have
the highest share of specialty skills in the socio-cognitive lobe of skills
space.
Policy and Practice
Recommendations
• Both skills and industrial tightness should be
fostered to increase regional per capita output.
• Growing jobs that utilize socio-cognitive
skills may increase skills tightness and thus regional productivity.
• Moderately-urbaniz |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2524-8162 2524-8162 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s42854-022-00044-6 |