Segmentation and multiparametric evaluation of corneal whorl-like nerves for in vivo confocal microscopy images in dry eye disease

ObjectiveTo establish an automated corneal nerve analysis system for corneal in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images from both the whorl-like corneal nerves in the inferior whorl (IW) region and the straight ones in the central cornea and to characterise the geometric features of cornea nerves in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open ophthalmology 2024-10, Vol.9 (1), p.e001861
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Kang, Chen, Yupei, Feng, Ziqing, Wang, Gengyuan, Deng, Yuqing, Li, Jiaxiong, Ling, Lirong, Xu, Ruiwen, Xiao, Peng, Yuan, Jin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectiveTo establish an automated corneal nerve analysis system for corneal in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images from both the whorl-like corneal nerves in the inferior whorl (IW) region and the straight ones in the central cornea and to characterise the geometric features of cornea nerves in dry eye disease (DED).Methods and analysisAn encoder–decoder-based semi-supervised method was proposed for corneal nerve segmentation. This model’s performance was compared with the ground truth provided by experienced clinicians, using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean intersection over union (mIoU), accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sen) and specificity (Spe). The corneal nerve total length (CNFL), tortuosity (CNTor), fractal dimension (CNDf) and number of branching points (CNBP) were used for further analysis in an independent DED dataset including 50 patients with DED and 30 healthy controls.ResultsThe model achieved 95.72% Acc, 97.88% Spe, 80.61% Sen, 75.26% DSC, 77.57% mIoU and an area under the curve value of 0.98. For clinical evaluation, the CNFL, CNBP and CNDf for whorl-like and straight nerves showed a significant decrease in DED patients compared with healthy controls (p
ISSN:2397-3269
2397-3269
DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001861