Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and arterial spin labeling MRI in evaluating Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment using integrated PET/MR

Background Developing biomarkers for early stage AD patients is crucial. Glucose metabolism measured by 18 F-FDG PET is the most common biomarker for evaluating cellular energy metabolism to diagnose AD. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI can potentially provide comparable diagnostic information to 18...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:EJNMMI research 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.9-10, Article 9
Hauptverfasser: Bi, Sheng, Yan, Shaozhen, Chen, Zhigeng, Cui, Bixiao, Shan, Yi, Yang, Hongwei, Qi, Zhigang, Zhao, Zhilian, Han, Ying, Lu, Jie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Developing biomarkers for early stage AD patients is crucial. Glucose metabolism measured by 18 F-FDG PET is the most common biomarker for evaluating cellular energy metabolism to diagnose AD. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI can potentially provide comparable diagnostic information to 18 F-FDG PET in patients with neurodegenerative disorders. However, the conclusions about the diagnostic performance of AD are still controversial between 18 F-FDG PET and ASL. This study aims to compare quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) and glucose metabolism measured by 18 F-FDG PET diagnostic values in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) using integrated PET/MR. Results Analyses revealed overlapping between decreased regional rCBF and 18 F-FDG PET SUVR in patients with AD compared with NC participants in the bilateral parietotemporal regions, frontal cortex, and cingulate cortex. Compared with NC participants, patients with aMCI exclusively demonstrated lower 18 F-FDG PET SUVR in the bilateral temporal cortex, insula cortex, and inferior frontal cortex. Comparison of the rCBF in patients with aMCI and NC participants revealed no significant difference ( P  > 0.05). The ROC analysis of rCBF in the meta-ROI could diagnose patients with AD (AUC, 0.87) but not aMCI (AUC, 0.61). The specificity of diagnosing aMCI has been improved to 75.56% when combining rCBF and 18 F-FDG PET SUVR. Conclusion ASL could detect similar aberrant patterns of abnormalities compared to 18 F-FDG PET in patients with AD compared with NC participants but not in aMCI. The diagnostic efficiency of 18 F-FDG-PET for AD and aMCI patients remained higher to ASL. Our findings support that applying 18 F-FDG PET may be preferable for diagnosing AD and aMCI. Key points Hypometabolic brain areas are more widespread in patients with AD and aMCI than hypoperfused brain areas. 18 F-FDG PET provides superior diagnostic performance over ASL for patients with AD and aMCI. After comprehensive consideration, PET alone is recommended for the diagnosis of AD and aMCI patients.
ISSN:2191-219X
2191-219X
DOI:10.1186/s13550-024-01068-8