Reduced skeletal muscle independently predicts 1-year aggravated joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background: Numerous cross-sectional studies have reported the associations between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and reduced skeletal muscle. We firstly explored the dynamic change of skeletal muscle and its effect on RA clinical outcomes in a real-world prospective cohort. Methods: Consecutive RA pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease 2020, Vol.12, p.1759720X20946220-1759720X20946220
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Jian-Zi, Liu, Yin, Ma, Jian-Da, Mo, Ying-Qian, Chen, Chu-Tao, Chen, Le-Feng, Li, Qian-Hua, Yang, Ze-Hong, Zheng, Dong-Hui, Ling, Li, Miossec, Pierre, Dai, Lie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Numerous cross-sectional studies have reported the associations between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and reduced skeletal muscle. We firstly explored the dynamic change of skeletal muscle and its effect on RA clinical outcomes in a real-world prospective cohort. Methods: Consecutive RA patients were treated according to the treat-to-target strategy and completed at least 1-year follow up. Clinical data and muscle index (assessed by bioelectric impedance analysis) were collected at baseline and visits at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Myopenia was defined by appendicular skeletal muscle mass index ⩽7.0 kg/m2 in men and ⩽5.7 kg/m2 in women. A 1-year radiographic progression as primary outcome was defined by a change in the total Sharp/van der Heijde modified score ⩾0.5 units. Results: Among 348 recruited patients, 315 RA patients (mean age 47.9 years, 84.4% female) completed 1-year follow up. There were 143 (45.4%) RA patients showing myopenia at baseline. Compared with those without baseline myopenia, RA patients with baseline myopenia had higher rate of 1-year radiographic progression (43.4% versus 21.5%, all p 
ISSN:1759-720X
1759-7218
DOI:10.1177/1759720X20946220