Revisiting SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination by patients with COVID-19: The Omicron variant does not differ from previous strains

•Inferred viral shedding (cycle threshold [Ct] values) was not different between first variants and Omicron.•No viable SARS-CoV-2 virus was detected in air samples taken in proximity to patients.•No viable SARS-CoV-2 virus was detected in surface samples taken near patients.•Omicron-enhanced transmi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of infectious diseases 2022-05, Vol.118, p.211-213
Hauptverfasser: Glinert, Itai, Ben-Shmuel, Amir, Szwartcwort-Cohen, Moran, Beth-din, Adi, Laskar, Orly, Barlev-Gross, Moria, Melamed, Sharon, Arbell, Noga, Levy, Haim, Horowitz, Netanel A, Weiss, Shay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Inferred viral shedding (cycle threshold [Ct] values) was not different between first variants and Omicron.•No viable SARS-CoV-2 virus was detected in air samples taken in proximity to patients.•No viable SARS-CoV-2 virus was detected in surface samples taken near patients.•Omicron-enhanced transmissibility was not a result of acquiring airborne infectivity. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strain emergence raised concerns that its enhanced infectivity is partly due to altered spread/contamination modalities. We therefore sampled high-contact surfaces and air in close proximity to patients who were verified as infected with the Omicron strain, using identical protocols applied to sample patients positive to the original or Alpha strains. Cumulatively, for all 3 strains, viral RNA was detected in 90 of 168 surfaces and 6 of 49 air samples (mean cycle threshold [Ct]=35.2±2.5). No infective virus was identified. No significant differences in prevalence were found between strains.
ISSN:1201-9712
1878-3511
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.001