Echocardiographic Follow-up of Robotic Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Regurgitation due to Degenerative Disease
Background: Mitral valve (MV) repair can now be carried out through small incisions with the use of robotic assistance. Previous reports have demonstrated the excellent clinical result of robotic MV repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). However, there has been limited infomlation regard...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chinese medical journal 2016-09, Vol.129 (18), p.2199-2203 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Mitral valve (MV) repair can now be carried out through small incisions with the use of robotic assistance. Previous reports have demonstrated the excellent clinical result of robotic MV repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). However, there has been limited infomlation regarding tile echocardiographic follow-up of these patients. The present study was therefore to evaluate the echocardiographic follow-up outcomes after robotic MV repair in patients with MR due to degenerative disease of the MV. Methods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken using data from the echocardiographic database of our department. Between March 2007 and February 2015, 84 patients with degenerative MR underwent robotic MV repair. The repair techniques included leaflet resection in 67 patients (79.8%), artificial chordae in 20 (23.8%), and ring annuloplasty in 79 (94.1%). Eighty-one (96.4%) of the 84 patients were eligible for echocardiographic follow-up assessment, and no patients were lost to follow-up. Results: At a median echocardiographic follow-up of 36.0 months (interquartile range 14.3-59.4 months), lbur patients (4.9%) developed recurrent mild MR, and no patients had more than mild MR. Mean MR grade, leli atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and let1 ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly decreased when compared with preoperative values. Mean MR grade decreased from 3.96 ± 0.13 to 0.17 ± 0.49 (Z- -8.456, P 〈 0.001 ), LAD from 43.8 ± 5.9 to 35.5 ± 3.8 mm (I - 15.131, P 〈 0.001 ), LVEDD fiom 51.0 ± 5.0 to 43.3 ± 2.2 mm (t = 14.481, P 〈 0.001 ), and LV EF l'rom 67.3 ± 7.0% to 63.9 ± 5.1% (t = 4.585, P 〈 0.001 ). Conclusion: Robotic MV repair for MR due to degenerative disease is associated with a low rate of recurrent MR, and a significant improvement in MR grade, LAD, and LVEDD, but a significant decrease in LVEF at echocardiographic follow-up. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0366-6999 2542-5641 |
DOI: | 10.4103/0366-6999.189909 |