Effect of ethanol-wet-bonding technique on resin–enamel bonds

Abstract Background/purpose It was reported that more stable resin--dentin bonds were achieved by using ethanol-wet bonding. Because it would be difficult to saturate acid-etched dentin with ethanol without saturation enamel, the study was conducted to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dental sciences 2014-03, Vol.9 (1), p.16-22
Hauptverfasser: Ayar, Muhammet Kerim, Yesilyurt, Cemal, Alp, Cemile Kedici, Yildirim, Tahsin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background/purpose It was reported that more stable resin--dentin bonds were achieved by using ethanol-wet bonding. Because it would be difficult to saturate acid-etched dentin with ethanol without saturation enamel, the study was conducted to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of adhesive resins bonded to enamel using water- and ethanol-wet-bonding techniques. Materials and methods Flat enamel surfaces from extracted bovine incisor teeth were conditioned with 37% H3 PO4 (for 15 seconds) before bonding. Two commercial adhesives (Single Bond 2 and All Bond 3) were applied to enamel using water- and ethanol-wet-bonding techniques (for 1 minute) as follows: group I, Single Bond 2 and water-wet bonding; group II, All Bond 3 and water-wet bonding; group III, Single Bond 2 and ethanol-wet-bonding; and group IV, All Bond 3 and ethanol-wet-bonding. Resin-bonded teeth were stored in distilled water (for 24 hours) and sectioned in beams for μTBS testing. μTBS results were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA and LSD test. The resin–enamel interfaces were examined by SEM. Results The following mean μTBS values were obtained: 17.4 MPa for group I, 26.4 MPa for group II, 28.7 MPa for group III, and 31 MPa for group IV. For both adhesives, the obtained adhesive-enamel μTBS values with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique were significantly higher than those of the water-wet-bonding technique (P 
ISSN:1991-7902
DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2012.10.008