Construction and verification of a novel prognostic risk model for kidney renal clear cell carcinoma based on immunity-related genes

Currently, there are no useful biomarkers or prognostic risk markers for the diagnosis of kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), although recent research has shown that both, the onset and progression of KIRC, are substantially influenced by immune-associated genes (IAGs). This work aims to creat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in genetics 2023-01, Vol.14, p.1107294
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Yufeng, Wu, Dali, Chen, Haiping, Yan, Lingfei, Xiang, Qi, Li, Qing, Wang, Tao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Currently, there are no useful biomarkers or prognostic risk markers for the diagnosis of kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), although recent research has shown that both, the onset and progression of KIRC, are substantially influenced by immune-associated genes (IAGs). This work aims to create and verify the prognostic value of an immune risk score signature (IRSS) based on IAGs for KIRC using bioinformatics and public databases. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to the immune systems (IAGs) in KIRC tissues were identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases. The DEGs between the tumor and normal tissues were identified using gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses. Furthermore, a prognostic IRSS model was constructed and its prognostic and predictive performance was analyzed using survival analyses and nomograms. Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (KIRP) sets were utilized to further validate this model. Six independent immunity-related genes (PAEP, PI3, SAA2, SAA1, IL20RB, and IFI30) correlated with prognosis were identified and used to construct an IRSS model. According to the Kaplan-Meier curve, patients in the high-risk group had significantly poorer prognoses than those of patients in the low-risk group in both, the verification set (
ISSN:1664-8021
1664-8021
DOI:10.3389/fgene.2023.1107294