Impact of cluster headache on employment status and job burden: a prospective cross-sectional multicenter study

Background Cluster headaches (CH) are recurrent severe headaches, which impose a major burden on the life of patients. We investigated the impact of CH on employment status and job burden. Methods The study was a sub-study of the Korean Cluster Headache Registry. Patients with CH were enrolled from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of headache and pain 2018-09, Vol.19 (1), p.78-8, Article 78
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Yun-Ju, Kim, Byung-Kun, Chung, Pil-Wook, Lee, Mi Ji, Park, Jung-Wook, Chu, Min Kyung, Ahn, Jin-Young, Kim, Byung-Su, Song, Tae-Jin, Sohn, Jong-Hee, Oh, Kyungmi, Lee, Kwang-Soo, Kim, Soo-Kyoung, Park, Kwang-Yeol, Chung, Jae Myun, Moon, Heui-Soo, Chung, Chin-Sang, Cho, Soo-Jin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Cluster headaches (CH) are recurrent severe headaches, which impose a major burden on the life of patients. We investigated the impact of CH on employment status and job burden. Methods The study was a sub-study of the Korean Cluster Headache Registry. Patients with CH were enrolled from September 2016 to February 2018 from 15 headache clinics in Korea. We also enrolled a headache control group with age-sex matched patients with migraine or tension-type headache. Moreover, a control group including individuals without headache complaints was recruited. All participants responded to a questionnaire that included questions on employment status, type of occupation, working time, sick leave, reductions in productivity, and satisfaction with current occupation. The questionnaire was administered to participants who were currently employed or had previous occupational experience. Results We recruited 143 patients with CH, 38 patients with other types of headache (migraine or tension-type headache), and 52 headache-free controls. The proportion of employees was lower in the CH group compared with the headache and headache-free control groups (CH: 67.6% vs. headache controls: 84.2% vs. headache-free controls: 96.2%; p  = 0.001). The CH group more frequently experienced difficulties at work and required sick leave than the other groups (CH: 84.8% vs. headache controls: 63.9% vs. headache-free controls: 36.5%; p  
ISSN:1129-2369
1129-2377
DOI:10.1186/s10194-018-0911-x