Coherence, not conditional meaning, accounts for the relevance effect

Missing-link conditionals like "If bats have wings, Paris is in France" are generally felt to be unacceptable even though both clauses are true. According to the , this is explained by a conventional requirement of an inferential connection between conditional clauses. Bayesian theorists h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in psychology 2023-05, Vol.14, p.1150550-1150550
Hauptverfasser: Bourlier, Maxime, Jacquet, Baptiste, Lassiter, Daniel, Baratgin, Jean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Missing-link conditionals like "If bats have wings, Paris is in France" are generally felt to be unacceptable even though both clauses are true. According to the , this is explained by a conventional requirement of an inferential connection between conditional clauses. Bayesian theorists have denied the need for such a requirement, appealing instead to a requirement of discourse coherence that extends to all ways of connecting clauses. Our experiment compared conditionals (" "), conjunctions (" "), and bare juxtapositions (" ."). With one systematic exception that is predicted by prior work in coherence theory, the presence or absence of an inferential link affected conditionals and other statement types in the same way. This is as expected according to the Bayesian approach together with a general theory of discourse coherence.
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150550