A multicenter randomized control trial: Point‐of‐care syndromic assessment versus standard testing in urgent care center patients with acute respiratory illness

Objective Syndromic assessment with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) testing in patients with acute respiratory illness (ARI) allows for simultaneous identification of multiple possible infectious etiologies. Point‐of‐care (POC) syndromic assessment can be conducted in a clinical setting,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open 2024-10, Vol.5 (5), p.e13306-n/a, Article e13306
Hauptverfasser: Meltzer, Andrew C., Loganathan, Aditya, Moran, Seamus, Shahamatdar, Soroush, Dominguez, Luis W., Willis, Joel, Zhang, Wei, Zhang, Xinyi, Ma, Yan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Syndromic assessment with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) testing in patients with acute respiratory illness (ARI) allows for simultaneous identification of multiple possible infectious etiologies. Point‐of‐care (POC) syndromic assessment can be conducted in a clinical setting, such as an urgent care center (UCC), without requiring certified laboratories. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether POC syndromic assessment improved patient satisfaction for patients seen at an UCC with ARI; secondary objectives included whether syndromic assessment reduced self‐isolation time, increased diagnostic confidence, and reduced overall antibiotic utilization. Methods We conducted an unblinded multicenter randomized controlled trial on UCC patients with an ARI. Patients were randomized to either SC (defined as standard UCC testing for ARI) or syndromic assessment with POC mPCR. Patients were surveyed for patient satisfaction, self‐isolation plans, diagnostic confidence, and overall antibiotic utilization. Results Among the 360 patients enrolled, those in the syndromic assessment group were more satisfied with the time required to communicate the results (98.4% vs. 42.4%, p 
ISSN:2688-1152
2688-1152
DOI:10.1002/emp2.13306