Effectiveness and safety of salmeterol/fluticasone fixed-dose combination delivered through Synchrobreathe® in patients with asthma: the real-world EVOLVE study

Background: Inhalation therapy with corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists has been the mainstay of asthma management. However, choosing the correct inhaler technique is essential to effectively deliver the medication to the lungs to attain good asthma control. Objective: This study aimed to ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease 2022-01, Vol.16, p.17534666221137272
Hauptverfasser: Balamurugan, Santhalingam, Sonia, Dalal, Vikrant, Deshmukh, Monotosh, Khanra, Raj Shyam, Sundar, Shamim, Akhtar, Vinay, Kumar, Velayuthaswamy, Nandagopal, Masood, Ahmed, Manohar Lal, Gupta, Ajay, Godse, Sushmeeta, Chhowala, Meena, Lopez, Sandesh, Sawant, Sonali, Jadhav, Abhijit, Vaidya, Jaideep, Gogtay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Inhalation therapy with corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists has been the mainstay of asthma management. However, choosing the correct inhaler technique is essential to effectively deliver the medication to the lungs to attain good asthma control. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate asthma control and device usability with salmeterol/fluticasone fixed-dose combination (FDC) administered through Synchrobreathe®, a breath-actuated inhaler (BAI), in Indian patients with persistent asthma (EVOLVE study). Design: The present study was a prospective, open-label, non-comparative, multi-center, observational study. Methods: The study enrolled 490 patients with documented diagnoses of asthma who were treatment-naive or uncontrolled due to poor inhaler technique associated with a previous device. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) score at week 12. Results: Mean ACQ-6 score reduced from 2.2 ± 1.07 (baseline) to 0.4 ± 0.49 (mean change: –1.9 ± 1.12, p 
ISSN:1753-4666
1753-4658
1753-4666
DOI:10.1177/17534666221137272