Morphological Asymmetry of Pelvic Rings: A Study Based on Three‐Dimensional Deviation Analysis

Objective To evaluate the morphological asymmetry of pelvic rings existing in healthy individuals in terms of three‐dimensional (3D) geometric shapes. Methods This study was a retrospective self‐control study. CT images of healthy pelvises, scanned from Jan 2014 to Jan 2019, were taken from 159 subj...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedic surgery 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.967-976
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Fan, Zhang, Dengming, Huang, Zhou, Wang, Zhizhong, Cai, Xianhua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To evaluate the morphological asymmetry of pelvic rings existing in healthy individuals in terms of three‐dimensional (3D) geometric shapes. Methods This study was a retrospective self‐control study. CT images of healthy pelvises, scanned from Jan 2014 to Jan 2019, were taken from 159 subjects (88 males and 71 females) aged 20 to 59 years (39.1 ± 8.7 years). Digital pelvic ring models were reconstructed from CT images and then flipped over the corresponding sagittal planes to obtain their mirrored models. A 3D deviation analysis of a pelvic ring was conducted between the original model and its mirrored model via model registration and quantification of the geometric differences. Next, the pelvic rings were split to the left and right hipbones. The same flipping procedures as done by pelvic rings were performed for left hipbones to obtain their mirrored models. A 3D deviation analysis was also performed between the left and right hip bones. Quantitative variables representing deviation mainly included the average deviation (AD) and the maximum deviation (MD). MDs over 4 mm and 10 mm were deemed as critical levels for evaluating the severity of asymmetry as per Matta's scoring system. The quantitative assessments of the asymmetry covered pelvic rings, bilateral hip bones and the specific anatomic regions of a hip bone. Results 157 out of 159 pelvic rings (98.74%) had more than 4 mm of the MD and 27 (16.98%) of them exceeded 10 mm of the MD. The MD of pelvic rings was 1.23 times as high as that for the bilateral hip bones (7.46 mm vs. 6.08 mm, P 
ISSN:1757-7853
1757-7861
DOI:10.1111/os.13246