A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial of Different Treatment Regimens for Melancholic Depression

Background: Fluoxetine, bupropion, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and physical therapies (modified electroconvulsive treatment or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) can be used to manage melancholic depression. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of various treatments in pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment 2021-01, Vol.17, p.2441-2449
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Yun, Liu, Xiaohua, Peng, Daihui, Wu, Yan, Su, Yun'ai, Xu, Jia, Ma, Xiancang, Li, Yi, Shi, Jianfei, Cheng, Xiaojing, Rong, Han, Fang, Yiru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Fluoxetine, bupropion, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and physical therapies (modified electroconvulsive treatment or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) can be used to manage melancholic depression. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of various treatments in patients with melancholic depression. Methods: This was a preliminary multicenter randomized controlled trial that included patients with depression in their first or recurrent acute episode between September 2016 and June 2019, and randomized to fluoxetine, fluoxetine+CBT, fluoxetine+bupropion, and fluoxetine+bupropion+brain stimulation. The primary endpoint was the decrease in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-HDRS). The secondary endpoint included the scores from the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR), QOL-6, and safety. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. The follow-ups were performed at the end of the 0th, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 12th weeks of treatment. Results: Finally, 113 patients were included in the analyses: fluoxetine (n=37), fluoxetine +CBT (n=27), fluoxetine+bupropion (n=34), and fluoxetine+bupropion+brain stimulation (n=15). The 17-HDRS and QIDS-SR scores decreased in all four groups (all P
ISSN:1178-2021
1176-6328
1178-2021
DOI:10.2147/NDT.S303938