Feasibility of online radial magnetic resonance imaging for adaptive radiotherapy of pancreatic tumors

•Extensive investigation of radial magnetic resonance imaging for online treatment adaptation for pancreatic tumors.•Radial magnetic resonance imaging with partially overlapping strips had improved in-plane quality.•Radial stack-of-stars sequences were unsuitable for delineation but might still aid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics and imaging in radiation oncology 2023-04, Vol.26, p.100434-100434, Article 100434
Hauptverfasser: Grimbergen, Guus, Eijkelenkamp, Hidde, van Vulpen, Jonna K., van de Ven, Saskia, Raaymakers, Bas W., Intven, Martijn P.W., Meijer, Gert J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Extensive investigation of radial magnetic resonance imaging for online treatment adaptation for pancreatic tumors.•Radial magnetic resonance imaging with partially overlapping strips had improved in-plane quality.•Radial stack-of-stars sequences were unsuitable for delineation but might still aid as auxiliary imaging. Online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided treatment planning for pancreatic tumors on 1.5T systems typically employs Cartesian 3D T2w magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The main disadvantage of this sequence is that respiratory motion results in substantial blurring in the abdomen, which can hamper delineation accuracy. This study investigated the use of two motion-robust radial MRI sequences as main delineation scan for pancreatic MR-guided radiotherapy. Twelve patients with pancreatic tumors were imaged with a 3D T2w scan, a Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction (PROPELLER) scan (partially overlapping strips), and a 3D Vane scan (stack-of-stars), on a 1.5T MR-Linac under abdominal compression. The scans were assessed by three radiation oncologists for their suitability for online adaptive delineation. A quantitative comparison was made for gradient entropy and the effect of motion on apparent target position. The PROPELLER scans were selected as first preference in 56% of the cases, the 3D T2w in 42% and the 3D Vane in 3%. PROPELLER scans sometimes contained a large interslice variation which would have compromised delineation. Gradient entropy was significantly higher in 3D T2w patient scans. The apparent target position was more sensitive to motion amplitude in the PROPELLER scans, but substantial offsets did not occur under 10 mm peak-to-peak. PROPELLER MRI may be a superior imaging sequence for pancreatic MRgRT compared to standard Cartesian sequences. The large interslice variation should be mitigated through further sequence optimization before PROPELLER can be adopted for online treatment adaptation.
ISSN:2405-6316
2405-6316
DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2023.100434