Mapping and Scaling of In Situ Above Ground Biomass to Regional Extent With SAR in the Great Slave Region

Global forests are increasingly threatened by disturbance events such as wildfire. Spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) missions at L‐ (or P‐) band, such as the upcoming NASA ISRO SAR (NISAR), have great potential to advance global mapping of above‐ground biomass (AGB). AGB mapping with SAR is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth and space science (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2022-12, Vol.9 (12), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Kraatz, S., Bourgeau‐Chavez, L., Battaglia, M., Poley, A., Siqueira, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Global forests are increasingly threatened by disturbance events such as wildfire. Spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) missions at L‐ (or P‐) band, such as the upcoming NASA ISRO SAR (NISAR), have great potential to advance global mapping of above‐ground biomass (AGB). AGB mapping with SAR is challenging due to lack of available L‐ or P‐ band data, and because SAR data are sensitive to confounding factors such as hydrology and terrain. This study uses recently collected AGB validation site data (AGBV) to produce a 1 ha biomass map about the Great Slave Lake in Canada using SAR data, and reports on NISAR's anticipated performance. This study addresses errors inherent to the representativeness of AGBVs with coarser grid/landscape scale processes by evaluating model performance as data are aggregated over increasingly larger areas (AOAs). Air and spaceborne SAR data were found to be interoperable after processing them according to analysis ready data specifications, improving data availability. Owing to poor model performance at two AGBVs, root‐mean‐square errors (RMSEs) were ∼60 Mg/ha, irrespective of AOA. When instead using NISAR's more lenient assessment criteria, RMSEs decreased to 32, 15, and 21 Mg/ha for the small (∼0.1 ha), medium (∼3.5 ha), and large (∼14 ha) AOA. Thus, AGB mapping in this region appears to benefit significantly from coarser data aggregations than to be used by NISAR's. This approach is practical for identifying a suitable scale of correspondence between the AGBV and SAR data and the landscape‐scale processes and can substantially improve AGB mapping accuracy. Key Points Airborne and spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) can be considered interoperable after processing to analysis ready data standard SAR‐in situ‐landscape scaling‐correspondence investigated using three different aggregations of 1‐ha SAR data (subpixel, ∼2 × 2, ∼4 × 4) The model performed best when averaging radar data over ∼2 × 2 grids (root‐mean square error [RMSE] 15 Mg/ha), and was used to create a map of above‐ground biomass
ISSN:2333-5084
2333-5084
DOI:10.1029/2022EA002431