Nulla executio sine titulo: the scrutiny of awards in the practice of international arbitration as a mechanism to optimize the enforcement of awards in Peru
What is «liquidable» and how should this concept be faced by arbitrators and judges? Can an enforcement judge determine concepts such as costs, interests and/or penalties if the arbitral tribunal has not provided any parameters? What fundamental rights might be violated? In accordance with internati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Derecho PUCP 2017-06 (78), p.69-114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | What is «liquidable» and how should this concept be faced by arbitrators and judges? Can an enforcement judge determine concepts such as costs, interests and/or penalties if the arbitral tribunal has not provided any parameters? What fundamental rights might be violated? In accordance with international arbitration practice, we will deal here with the problems arising from the division of functions between judges and arbitrators in relation to the enforcement of the «liquidable» concepts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0251-3420 0251-3420 |
DOI: | 10.18800/derechopucp.201701.004 |