Research Status and Thinking of Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcome Assessment Tool for Allergic Rhinitis

As the patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment tool has been increasingly used in the clinical efficacy evaluation of patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) , the judgment and interpretation of changes in measurement results of assessment tools have become increasingly important. For the judgment of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zhongguo quanke yixue 2022-04, Vol.25 (11), p.1314-1319
1. Verfasser: ZHANG Peng, REN Jiaming, GUAN Jiarui, XIE Yang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:chi
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:As the patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment tool has been increasingly used in the clinical efficacy evaluation of patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) , the judgment and interpretation of changes in measurement results of assessment tools have become increasingly important. For the judgment of clinical research results, not only the statistical differences, but also the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) must be paid attention to. This paper systematically sorts out the MCID of the AR-PRO assessment tool, in order to provide a reference for AR-related clinical diagnosis and treatment decision-making and the objectification of the PRO assessment tool.
ISSN:1007-9572
DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.01.502