Enhanced Branch Simulation to Improve RAPID in Optical Region Using RAMI Scenes
To improve the simulation accuracy of vegetation canopy reflectance in optical bands, the Radiosity Applicable to Porous IndiviDual objects (RAPID) model has been upgraded to better deal with branches in the latest RAPID4. Previous versions of RAPID (RAPID1 and RAPID3) neglected branches in porous o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of remote sensing 2023-01, Vol.3 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To improve the simulation accuracy of vegetation canopy reflectance in optical bands, the Radiosity Applicable to Porous IndiviDual objects (RAPID) model has been upgraded to better deal with branches in the latest RAPID4. Previous versions of RAPID (RAPID1 and RAPID3) neglected branches in porous objects in optical bands, while RAPID2 emphasized them in microwave bands. This inconsistency needed to be addressed to establish a unified radiosity-based simulation framework. By incorporating branches in RAPID4, we have improved several aspects of the model, including the random dynamic projection process, the equivalent reflectance or transmittance, the single scattering estimation, the multiple scattering solution, and the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) calculation. Three-dimensional trees from the fifth RAdiation transfer Model Intercomparison (RAMI-V) have been used to test the contribution of branches on BRF. Comparisons with a ray-tracing-based LESS model (the LargE-Scale remote sensing data and image Simulation framework) on RAMI-V scenes show a general agreement on BRF (
R
2
≥ 0.96 and root mean square error ranging from 0.014 to 0.054). The major biases occur in a realistic scene (i.e., HET51_WWO_TLS) created from terrestrial laser scanning data. Sensitivity analysis has been conducted to show the branch contribution on BRF in optical domain. Without considering dense branches, the BRF error can exceed 0.1. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2694-1589 2694-1589 |
DOI: | 10.34133/remotesensing.0039 |