Prognostic significance of the 8th edition of the TNM classification for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is typically categorized according to disease extent as limited or extensive, and utility of the 8th TNM classification, recommended for lung cancer staging, which demonstrates a strong association with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management, remains unclear. Thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer management and research 2018-01, Vol.10, p.6039-6047
Hauptverfasser: Shirasawa, Masayuki, Fukui, Tomoya, Kusuhara, Seiichiro, Hiyoshi, Yasuhiro, Ishihara, Mikiko, Kasajima, Masashi, Nakahara, Yoshiro, Otani, Sakiko, Igawa, Satoshi, Yokoba, Masanori, Mitsufuji, Hisashi, Kubota, Masaru, Katagiri, Masato, Sasaki, Jiichiro, Naoki, Katsuhiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is typically categorized according to disease extent as limited or extensive, and utility of the 8th TNM classification, recommended for lung cancer staging, which demonstrates a strong association with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management, remains unclear. This retrospective study included 277 consecutive SCLC patients treated at a single institution between 2008 and 2016. According to the currently used two-stage system, 186 (65.7%) of the patients were classified as having extensive disease (ED)-SCLC. Among the ED-SCLC patients, ten (5.3%), 38 (20.4%), 32 (17.2%), and 106 (57.0%) were categorized into stages M0, M1a, M1b, and M1c, respectively, according to the 8th TNM classification. There was a significant difference in overall survival based on the M descriptors: 15.8 (95% CI 9.4-22.2) months in the M1b group vs 7.3 (95% CI 5.7-8.9) months in the M1c group (
ISSN:1179-1322
1179-1322
DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S181789