Unravelling the multisensory learning advantage: Different patterns of within and across frequency-specific interactions drive uni- and multisensory neuroplasticity
•Multilayered connectivity analysis of EEG data models multisensory processing.•Multisensory vs. uni-sensory learning interventions induce distinct neural changes.•Multisensory training induces increased synchronization within the beta band.•Unisensory training modifies cross-frequency interaction.•...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2024-05, Vol.291, p.120582-120582, Article 120582 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Multilayered connectivity analysis of EEG data models multisensory processing.•Multisensory vs. uni-sensory learning interventions induce distinct neural changes.•Multisensory training induces increased synchronization within the beta band.•Unisensory training modifies cross-frequency interaction.•A theoretical framework aims to explain the advantage of multisensory learning.
In the field of learning theory and practice, the superior efficacy of multisensory learning over uni-sensory is well-accepted. However, the underlying neural mechanisms at the macro-level of the human brain remain largely unexplored. This study addresses this gap by providing novel empirical evidence and a theoretical framework for understanding the superiority of multisensory learning. Through a cognitive, behavioral, and electroencephalographic assessment of carefully controlled uni-sensory and multisensory training interventions, our study uncovers a fundamental distinction in their neuroplastic patterns. A multilayered network analysis of pre- and post- training EEG data allowed us to model connectivity within and across different frequency bands at the cortical level. Pre-training EEG analysis unveils a complex network of distributed sources communicating through cross-frequency coupling, while comparison of pre- and post-training EEG data demonstrates significant differences in the reorganizational patterns of uni-sensory and multisensory learning. Uni-sensory training primarily modifies cross-frequency coupling between lower and higher frequencies, whereas multisensory training induces changes within the beta band in a more focused network, implying the development of a unified representation of audiovisual stimuli. In combination with behavioural and cognitive findings this suggests that, multisensory learning benefits from an automatic top-down transfer of training, while uni-sensory training relies mainly on limited bottom-up generalization. Our findings offer a compelling theoretical framework for understanding the advantage of multisensory learning. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120582 |