Prophylactic treatment can modify vascular risk biomarkers in high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine patients: a pilot study

To evaluate whether preventive treatment can modify endothelial and oxidative biomarkers of vascular disease risk in patients with high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine. In this observational, prospective pilot study, 88 prophylactic treatment-naïve patients with episodic and chronic migraine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2023-11, Vol.13 (1), p.19416-19416, Article 19416
Hauptverfasser: González Mingot, Cristina, Santos Lasaosa, Sonia, Colàs Campàs, Laura, Chilangua Canaval, Laura, Gil Sánchez, Anna, Brieva Ruiz, Luis, Marzo Alonso, María Cristina, Peralta Moncusi, Silvia, Valls Marsal, Joan, Cambray Carner, Serafí, Purroy García, Francisco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate whether preventive treatment can modify endothelial and oxidative biomarkers of vascular disease risk in patients with high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine. In this observational, prospective pilot study, 88 prophylactic treatment-naïve patients with episodic and chronic migraine and 56 healthy sex/age matched controls underwent ultrasonography exams and blood tests at baseline, and again in the migraine patients after 3 months’ treatment with metoprolol or topiramate. Biomarkers for endothelial function and oxidative stress were analyzed. At baseline, patients with migraine in the low-frequency episodic group had differences exclusively in nitrates 17.6 versus 27.33 µM; p  = 0.046 compared to the controls. However, when comparing the group comprised of patients with high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine versus controls, statistically significant differences appeared in hsCRP 2.68 versus 1.64 mg/dL; p  = 0.049, vWF antigen (133% vs. 110%; p  = 0.020, vWF activity (111% vs. 90%; p  = 0.010) and isoprostane levels (181 vs. 238 µM; p  = 0.05). Only in the chronic migraine subgroup did we found statistically significant differences in CIMT (0.60 vs. 0.54 mm; p  = 0.042) which were significantly greater than in the controls. After treatment, patients who respond to preventive treatment exhibited significantly higher levels of nitrates (24.2–13.8 µM; p  = 0.022) and nitrites (10.4–3.43 µM; p  = 0.002) compared than non-responders. Moreover, biomarker levels improved in treatment-responsive patients with migraine; hsCRP levels decreased from 2.54 to 1.69 mg/dL ( p  
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-44522-8