The effect of climate type on timescales of drought propagation in an ensemble of global hydrological models
Drought is a natural hazard that occurs at many temporal and spatial scales and has severe environmental and socioeconomic impacts across the globe. The impacts of drought change as drought evolves from precipitation deficits to deficits in soil moisture or streamflow. Here, we quantified the time t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrology and earth system sciences 2018-09, Vol.22 (9), p.4649-4665 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Drought is a natural hazard that occurs at many temporal and spatial scales
and has severe environmental and socioeconomic impacts across the globe. The
impacts of drought change as drought evolves from precipitation deficits to
deficits in soil moisture or streamflow. Here, we quantified the time taken
for drought to propagate from meteorological drought to soil moisture
drought and from meteorological drought to hydrological drought. We did this
by cross-correlating the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) against
standardized indices (SIs) of soil moisture, runoff, and streamflow from an
ensemble of global hydrological models (GHMs) forced by a consistent meteorological
dataset. Drought propagation is strongly related to climate types, occurring
at sub-seasonal timescales in tropical climates and at up to multi-annual
timescales in continental and arid climates. Winter droughts are usually
related to longer SPI accumulation periods than summer droughts, especially
in continental and tropical savanna climates. The difference between the
seasons is likely due to winter snow cover in the former and distinct wet and
dry seasons in the latter. Model structure appears to play an important role
in model variability, as drought propagation to soil moisture drought is
slower in land surface models (LSMs) than in global hydrological models, but
propagation to hydrological drought is faster in land surface models than in
global hydrological models. The propagation time from SPI to hydrological
drought in the models was evaluated against observed data at 127 in situ
streamflow stations. On average, errors between observed and modeled drought
propagation timescales are small and the model ensemble mean is preferred
over the use of a single model. Nevertheless, there is ample opportunity for
improvement as substantial differences in drought propagation are found at
10 % of the study sites. A better understanding and representation of
drought propagation in models may help improve seasonal drought forecasting
as well as constrain drought variability under future climate scenarios. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1607-7938 1027-5606 1607-7938 |
DOI: | 10.5194/hess-22-4649-2018 |