Why is a review of the 1976 Convention on Limitation of Liability desirable?
The author emphasizes some topics: Problems about the circle of persons who can limit their liability; Should the mortgagee in possession of a ship be allowed to limit; What about claims for the raising and removal of sunken vessels ordered by the harbour authority; Ambiguities in the wording of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Uporedno pomorsko pravo = Comparative maritime law 1995-12, Vol.37 (145-148), p.73-82 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The author emphasizes some topics: Problems about the circle of persons who can limit their liability; Should the mortgagee in possession of a ship be allowed to limit; What about claims for the raising and removal of sunken vessels ordered by the harbour authority; Ambiguities in the wording of the conduct barring limitation; Burden of proof and set-off of claim and counterclaim; Reconciling passenger claims of the 1976 Limitation Convention, and the 1974 Passenger Convention. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0353-5487 |