Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effect of transversus abdominis plan block and quadratus lumborum block: A prospective randomized study

Background and Aims In this study, we aimed to compare the transversus abdominis plan block (TAP) and quadratus lumborum block (QL) efficacy for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing varicocelectomy under spinal anesthesia. Methods American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2 patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health science reports 2022-09, Vol.5 (5), p.e752-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Öncü, Gülşah, Boran, Ömer Faruk, Çalışır, Feyza, Orak, Yavuz, Bilal, Bora, Öksüz, Hafize
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aims In this study, we aimed to compare the transversus abdominis plan block (TAP) and quadratus lumborum block (QL) efficacy for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing varicocelectomy under spinal anesthesia. Methods American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2 patients, aged 18–45 years, who underwent varicocelectomy operation under elective conditions, were included. Eighty patients were divided into three groups as TAP group, QL group, and control group by prospective randomization. The patients were operated under spinal anesthesia. At the end of the operation, TAP was applied to the TAP group with a posterior approach using ultrasound (USG) in the supine position. To the QL group, the patient was placed in the lateral decubitus position and the lateral QL was applied via USG. No block type was applied to the control group. Patient‐controlled analgesia (PCA) device containing tramadol was administered intravenously at the end of the surgery in all groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was questioned at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24 h in the follow‐up of the patients. Intravenous 1 g paracetamol was given over VAS 4. PCA usage time and usage amounts were recorded. Results As a result of comparing the groups according to the VAS scores at all hours were significantly different between the three groups (p 
ISSN:2398-8835
2398-8835
DOI:10.1002/hsr2.752