The Hadamard‐Schwarz inequality
Given α 1 , …, α k arbitrary exterior forms in of degree l 1 , …, l k , does it follow that | α 1 ∧⋯∧ α k | ≤ | α 1 | ⋯ | α k | The answer is no in general. However, it is a persistent, popular and even published misconception that the answer is yes. Of course, a routine calculation reveals that the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Function Spaces and Applications 2004-01, Vol.2 (2), p.191-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Given α 1 , …, α k arbitrary exterior forms in of degree l 1 , …, l k , does it follow that | α 1 ∧⋯∧ α k | ≤ | α 1 | ⋯ | α k | The answer is no in general. However, it is a persistent, popular and even published misconception that the answer is yes. Of course, a routine calculation reveals that there exists at least a constant C n independent of the forms satisfying | α 1 ∧⋯∧ α k | ≤ C n | α 1 | ⋯ | α k | For reasons mentioned in the introduction, we refer to this as the Hadamard‐Schwarz inequality. However, what the best constant is, either overall or for the particular numbers l 1 , …, l k remains well short of clear.
It is the objective of this paper to explicitly describe the smallest constant for the Hadamard‐¬Schwarz inequality as well as to identify the associated forms for which equality occurs. We have answered these questions for a wide class of integers 0 ≤ l 1 , …, l k ≤ n . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2314-8896 2314-8888 0972-6802 |
DOI: | 10.1155/2004/763896 |