Genetic sex validation for sample tracking in next-generation sequencing clinical testing

Data from DNA genotyping via a 96-SNP panel in a study of 25,015 clinical samples were utilized for quality control and tracking of sample identity in a clinical sequencing network. The study aimed to demonstrate the value of both the precise SNP tracking and the utility of the panel for predicting...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC research notes 2024-03, Vol.17 (1), p.62-62, Article 62
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Jianhong, Korchina, Viktoriya, Zouk, Hana, Harden, Maegan V, Murdock, David, Macbeth, Alyssa, Harrison, Steven M, Lennon, Niall, Kovar, Christie, Balasubramanian, Adithya, Zhang, Lan, Chandanavelli, Gauthami, Pasham, Divya, Rowley, Robb, Wiley, Ken, Smith, Maureen E, Gordon, Adam, Jarvik, Gail P, Sleiman, Patrick, Kelly, Melissa A, Bland, Harris T, Murugan, Mullai, Venner, Eric, Boerwinkle, Eric, Prows, Cynthia, Mahanta, Lisa, Rehm, Heidi L, Gibbs, Richard A, Muzny, Donna M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Data from DNA genotyping via a 96-SNP panel in a study of 25,015 clinical samples were utilized for quality control and tracking of sample identity in a clinical sequencing network. The study aimed to demonstrate the value of both the precise SNP tracking and the utility of the panel for predicting the sex-by-genotype of the participants, to identify possible sample mix-ups. Precise SNP tracking showed no sample swap errors within the clinical testing laboratories. In contrast, when comparing predicted sex-by-genotype to the provided sex on the test requisition, we identified 110 inconsistencies from 25,015 clinical samples (0.44%), that had occurred during sample collection or accessioning. The genetic sex predictions were confirmed using additional SNP sites in the sequencing data or high-density genotyping arrays. It was determined that discrepancies resulted from clerical errors (49.09%), samples from transgender participants (3.64%) and stem cell or bone marrow transplant patients (7.27%) along with undetermined sample mix-ups (40%) for which sample swaps occurred prior to arrival at genome centers, however the exact cause of the events at the sampling sites resulting in the mix-ups were not able to be determined.
ISSN:1756-0500
1756-0500
DOI:10.1186/s13104-024-06723-w