Reducing sore throat following laryngeal mask airway insertion: comparing lidocaine gel, saline, and washing mouth with the control group

Laryngeal mask airway is still accompanied by complications such as sore throat. In this study, effects of three methods of reducing postoperative sore throat were compared with the control group. 240 patients with ASA I, II candidates for cataract surgery were randomly divided into four same groups...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) 2015-11, Vol.65 (6), p.450-454
Hauptverfasser: Taghavi Gilani, Mehryar, Miri Soleimani, Iman, Razavi, Majid, Salehi, Maryam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Laryngeal mask airway is still accompanied by complications such as sore throat. In this study, effects of three methods of reducing postoperative sore throat were compared with the control group. 240 patients with ASA I, II candidates for cataract surgery were randomly divided into four same groups. No supplementary method was used in the control group. In the second, third and fourth groups, lidocaine gel, washing cuff before insertion, and washing mouth before removing laryngeal mask airway were applied, respectively. Anesthesia induction was done with fentanyl, atracurium, and propofol and maintained with propofol infusion. The incidence of sore throat was evaluated during the recovery, 3–4h later and after 24h using verbal analog scale. The data were analyzed by t-test, analysis of variance and chi-square using SPSS V11.5. Age, gender, duration of surgery and cuff pressure were the same in all the four groups. Incidence of sore throat at recovery room was highest in the control group (43.3%) and lowest in the washing mouth group (25%). However, no significant statistical difference was observed between these four groups (recovery, p=0.30; discharge, p=0.31; examination, p=0.52). In this study, increased duration of operation had a significant relationship with the incidence of sore throat (p=0.041). Sore throat is a common postoperative problem, but no special method has been found completely efficient yet. In this study, cuff washing, lidocaine gel, and mouth washing before removing laryngeal mask airway were not helpful for sore throat. A máscara laríngea ainda é relacionada a complicações como a dor de garganta. Neste estudo, os efeitos de três métodos para reduzir a dor de garganta, no período pós-operatório, foram comparados com o grupo controle. Duzentos e quarenta candidatos,com estado físico ASA I-II, foram aleatoriamente divididos em quatro grupos iguais para a cirurgia de catarata.com estado físico ASA I-II, candidatos para a cirurgia de catarata foram aleatoriamente divididos em quatro grupos iguais. Nenhum método complementar foi usado no grupo controle. No segundo, terceiro e quarto grupos, os métodos utilizados foram: Aplicação de gel de lidocaína, lavagem do manguito antes da inserção e lavagem da boca antes de remover a máscara laríngea, respectivamente. A anestesia foi induzida com fentanil, atracúrio e propofol e mantida com propofol. A incidência de dor de garganta foi avaliada durante a recuperação, 3-4h depois e após 24h usando um
ISSN:0104-0014
1806-907X
0104-0014
DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2013.07.001