P2.21: Agreement of Central Blood Pressure Measured by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking
Background Some studies have shown the interest of measuring central blood pressure (CBP). Usually measured non-invasively through a function transfer by applanation tonometry (Sphygmocor®) CBP can also be calculated by echotracking (Art.Lab®) at the common carotid artery assuming the fact that the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Artery research 2013, Vol.7 (3-4), p.125-125 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Some studies have shown the interest of measuring central blood pressure (CBP). Usually measured non-invasively through a function transfer by applanation tonometry (Sphygmocor®) CBP can also be calculated by echotracking (Art.Lab®) at the common carotid artery assuming the fact that the distension waveform is similar to a pressure curve and thus be more precise. However, the agreement between CBP derived from these two devices remains not clear.
Objectives
To analyse the agreement between CBP and study the discrepancies between the two techniques.
Materials and methods
74 Patients from Pharmacology Department in Paris and from Surgery, Medical, Molecular, and Critical area pathology Department at Pisa university were matched for age, sex and BP. CBP was estimated by the onboard transfer function of the Sphygmocor® derived from radial measurement. Echotracking measurements were performed on right CCA (ART.LAB) and treated to obtain CBP. Pearson’s correlation and Bland&Altman graph were performed for carotid SBP and PP, and multivariate regressions to found the determinants of discrepancies.
Results
The correlations between the carotid BP were good (SBP: r = 0.79; PP: r = .77, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1872-9312 1876-4401 1876-4401 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.artres.2013.10.082 |