Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project

We aimed to describe clinician-patient communication in the diagnostic process of memory clinics, specifically clinician behavior known to facilitate knowledgeable participation of patients during consultations. In this multicenter, observational study, we audio-recorded routine diagnostic consultat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring assessment & disease monitoring, 2019-12, Vol.11 (1), p.520-528
Hauptverfasser: Visser, Leonie N.C., Kunneman, Marleen, Murugesu, Laxsini, van Maurik, Ingrid, Zwan, Marissa, Bouwman, Femke H., Schuur, Jacqueline, Wind, Hilje A., Blaauw, Marjolijn S.J., Kragt, J.Jolijn, Roks, Gerwin, Boelaarts, Leo, Schipper, Annemieke C., Schooneboom, Niki, Scheltens, Philip, van der Flier, Wiesje M., Smets, Ellen M.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We aimed to describe clinician-patient communication in the diagnostic process of memory clinics, specifically clinician behavior known to facilitate knowledgeable participation of patients during consultations. In this multicenter, observational study, we audio-recorded routine diagnostic consultations of 41 clinicians and 136 patients/caregivers at eight memory clinics. Patients/caregivers completed surveys after each audiotaped consultation. We used a study-specific coding scheme to categorize communication behavior. Clinicians often provided information on (results of) diagnostic testing. They infrequently invited questions and/or checked understanding. Clinician behavior to involve patients in decision-making about diagnostic testing was limited. Of note, patients/caregivers rarely expressed their information or involvement preferences. Yet, approximately, one quarter of them would have liked to receive more information. Involving patients more explicitly by means of shared decision-making could benefit the quality of care provided in memory clinics because it enables clinicians to attune the diagnostic workup to the individual patient's needs. •Considering patient preferences in the diagnostic process enables personalized care.•Knowledgeable participation in diagnostic consultations is therefore warranted.•Clinicians often provided information on diagnostic procedures and test results.•Yet, they showed limited behavior to promote patients' understanding.•And patients were seldom involved in decision-making about diagnostic testing.
ISSN:2352-8729
2352-8729
DOI:10.1016/j.dadm.2019.06.001