Triple Combination Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% for Acne: Efficacy and Safety from a Pooled Phase 3 Analysis

Introduction A three-pronged approach to acne treatment combining an antibiotic, antimicrobial, and retinoid may be more efficacious than single/double treatments while potentially reducing antibiotic resistance. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the first fixed-dose, triple-combinatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dermatology and therapy 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.1211-1227
Hauptverfasser: Kircik, Leon H., Stein Gold, Linda, Gold, Michael, Weiss, Jonathan S., Harper, Julie C., Del Rosso, James Q., Bunick, Christopher G., Bhatia, Neal, Tanghetti, Emil A., Eichenfield, Lawrence F., Baldwin, Hilary, Draelos, Zoe D., Callender, Valerie D., Han, George, Gooderham, Melinda J., Sadick, Neil, Lupo, Mary P., Lain, Edward (Ted), Werschler, William Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction A three-pronged approach to acne treatment combining an antibiotic, antimicrobial, and retinoid may be more efficacious than single/double treatments while potentially reducing antibiotic resistance. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the first fixed-dose, triple-combination topical acne product, clindamycin 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3.1% gel (CAB) using pooled phase 3 data. Methods In two identical phase 3 ( N  = 183; N  = 180), double-blind, 12-week studies, participants aged ≥ 9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized 2:1 to receive once-daily CAB or vehicle gel. Endpoints included ≥ 2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator’s Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin (treatment success) and least-squares mean percent change from baseline in acne lesion counts. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and cutaneous safety/tolerability were evaluated. Results At week 12, 50.0% of participants achieved treatment success with CAB versus 22.6% with vehicle gel ( P   70% reductions in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions at week 12 (77.9% and 73.0%, respectively), which were significantly greater than vehicle (57.9% and 48.2%; P  
ISSN:2193-8210
2190-9172
DOI:10.1007/s13555-024-01155-7