Evaluation of Ex-press implantation in primary open angle glaucoma

AIM:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Ex-press implantation in primary open angle glaucoma(POAG)patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 37 eyes in 28 POAG patients who were treated with Ex-press implantation in Changsha Aier Hospital from August 2013 to July 2015. All subjects had...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Guo ji yan ke za zhi 2017-02, Vol.17 (2), p.274-277
Hauptverfasser: Yuan Deng, Min-Na Rong, Wen Deng, Wen Li, Dan Zhou, Jun Li, Ding Lin, Chang-Hua Ye
Format: Artikel
Sprache:chi ; eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AIM:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Ex-press implantation in primary open angle glaucoma(POAG)patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 37 eyes in 28 POAG patients who were treated with Ex-press implantation in Changsha Aier Hospital from August 2013 to July 2015. All subjects had a minimum 6-month follow-up(mean 15.0±5.5mo). Success was defined as intraocular pressure(IOP)was 6-21mmHg without complications, with or without glaucoma medicines. Life-table analysis was used to assess the cumulative probabilities of success in different follow-up time. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the relations between survival outcomes and multiple predictors. RESULTS: The follow-up ranged from 6-24mo(mean 15.0±5.5mo). Visual acuity was significantly different between preoperation and the final follow-up(z=-2.40, P=0.016). The preoperative IOP was 37.4±12.7mmHg, and the postoperative IOP at 1d, 1wk, 1, 3, 6mo, 1, 1.5, 2a were 11.9±7.0, 9.4±3.9, 12.2±9.2, 11.5±6.4, 10.9±3.6, 11.5±5.8, 10.7±2.9 and 9.6±2.3mmHg, respectively. IOP was significantly different between preoperation and the final follow-up(F=24.45, P
ISSN:1672-5123
1672-5123
DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2017.2.20