CT-Guided Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy in Typing and Subtyping Lung Cancer: A Comparison to Surgery

Background: Lung cancer histologic types and subtypes are closely associated with treatment selection and prognosis prediction. In this study, we aim to evaluate the suitability of computed tomography-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (CT-guided PCNB) in typing and subtyping lung cancer. Method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Technology in cancer research & treatment 2022-01, Vol.21, p.15330338221086411-15330338221086411
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Hanfei, Tian, Sufang, Wang, Shan, Liu, Songmei, Liao, Meiyan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Lung cancer histologic types and subtypes are closely associated with treatment selection and prognosis prediction. In this study, we aim to evaluate the suitability of computed tomography-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (CT-guided PCNB) in typing and subtyping lung cancer. Methods: From August 2007 to December 2015, the patients who underwent CT-guided PCNB and lung lesion resection were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All pathological sections were reassessed in consensus by 2 junior pathologists (group A) and 2 senior pathologists (group B), respectively. All cases were diagnosed on 3 levels: first, malignant and benign diagnosis; second, histologic types diagnosis; and third, histologic subtypes diagnosis and compared with surgery results. Pearson chi-square test was used to compare the differences of diagnostic accuracy between pathologists in group A and group B. Results: A cohort of 160 patients was included in this study. On the first level, the diagnostic accuracy was 90.63% (group A) and 94.38% (group B), (P = .20). On the second level, the diagnostic accuracy for malignant lesions, adenocarcinoma (ADC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) were, respectively, 72.66%, 84.72%, and 69.05% (group A) and 76.98%, 90.28%, and 71.43% (group B) (P > .05). On the third level, the diagnostic accuracy for ADC subtypes were 26.39% (group A) and 55.56% (group B) (P 
ISSN:1533-0346
1533-0338
DOI:10.1177/15330338221086411