Drug susceptibility testing using molecular techniques can enhance diagnosis in a community with a high tuberculosis incidence

Background: Sputum samples were collected from tuberculosis patients in a high tuberculosis incidence area in the Western Cape, South Africa. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and time to diagnosis of a genotypic drug susceptibility testing method.Methodology: During June 2000 an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of infection in developing countries 2008-02, Vol.2 (1), p.40-45
1. Verfasser: Rabia Johnson,1 Annemie M. Jordaan,1 Rob Warren,1 Marleine Bosman,2 Douglas Young,3 Judit N. Nagy,3 John R. Wain,4 Paul D. van Helden,1 Thomas C. Victor.1
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Sputum samples were collected from tuberculosis patients in a high tuberculosis incidence area in the Western Cape, South Africa. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and time to diagnosis of a genotypic drug susceptibility testing method.Methodology: During June 2000 and November 2003, a total of 1,540 samples were sent for drug susceptibility testing (DST) to the national health laboratory services, and of those, a phenotypic DST result was obtained for 1,373 samples whereas a genotypic DST result was obtained for 1,301 of 1,540 samples. Performance-based calculations were done on 1,244 samples for which both a phenotypic and genotypic DST result was available.Results: The reproducibility of the genotypic and phenotypic DST methods was 97% and 95%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the genotypic DST method was 68% and 99% for Isoniazid and 87% and 99% for Rifampicin, respectively. Smear gradation was found to influence the performance of the genotypic DST method. The genotypic DST method gave accurate DST results for 75% of the samples within 20 days (range, 15-25), whereas the phenotypic DST results were only available for 75% of the samples after 38 days (range, 26-115) (p
ISSN:1972-2680