Use of buffer methods to estimate the potential acidity of Mato Grosso soils
ABSTRACT Mato Grosso, with a total area of 903357 km², does not have an official methodology for estimating soil potential acidity (H + Al), and determination of H + Al using the standard method is onerous and time consuming. The objective of this study was to compare estimated values of H + Al dete...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ciência e agrotecnologia 2020-01, Vol.44 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACT Mato Grosso, with a total area of 903357 km², does not have an official methodology for estimating soil potential acidity (H + Al), and determination of H + Al using the standard method is onerous and time consuming. The objective of this study was to compare estimated values of H + Al determined using the standard calcium acetate method with those obtained using three buffer methods, namely, the Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (SMP) buffer, Sikora buffer, and Santa Maria buffer (SMB) methods, with samples of the main classes of cultivated soils in the state of Mato Grosso. A total of 196 soil samples were collected from the arable layer (0-20 cm) in agropastoral and adjacent native systems. Statistical models were obtained and compared with models used by laboratories that are hypothetically inadequate because there is no calibration for soils in the state. After laboratory analyses, the paired H + Al and equilibrium pH values corresponding to the equilibrium of each buffer solution (SMP buffer, SMB, and Sikora buffer) were subjected to nonlinear regression analysis (P < 0.05). The SMB method, which does not release pollutant residues into the environment, was better than the Sikora and SMP methods for replacing the standard method used in state laboratories for soil analysis, that is, H + Al (cm3 c dm-3) = 51.189 -25.70 ln(pHSMB) (R2 = 0.88, P < 0.0001). Thus, if laboratories use uncalibrated equations to estimate soil potential acidity, the recommended limestone correction will be underestimated or overestimated, which may compromise crop productivity in Mato Grosso.
RESUMO O estado de Mato Grosso, com uma área de 903 357 km², não possui uma metodologia oficial para estimar a acidez potencial do solo (H + Al), e sua determinação pelo método padrão é onerosa e demorada. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os valores estimados de (H + Al) determinados pelo método padrão de acetato de cálcio com os obtidos por três métodos tampão, a saber, tampão Shoemaker, McLean and Pratt (SMP), tampão Sikora e tampão Santa Maria (SMB), considerando amostras das principais classes de solos cultivados no estado de Mato Grosso. Para isso, 196 amostras de solo foram coletadas na camada arável (0-20 cm) em diferentes sistemas agropastoris e nativos adjacentes. Os modelos estatísticos obtidos foram comparados com modelos hipoteticamente inadequados utilizados pelos laboratórios, pois não há calibração para solos no estado. Após as análises laboratoriais, os pares de va |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1413-7054 1981-1829 1981-1829 |
DOI: | 10.1590/1413-7054202044026019 |