Demographic and geographic distribution of diabetes and pre-diabetes risk in rural settings: results from a cross-sectional, countywide rural health survey in Sullivan County, New York

ObjectiveTo perform a detailed characterisation of diabetes burden and pre-diabetes risk in a rural county with previously documented poor health outcomes in order to understand the local within-county distribution of diabetes in rural areas of America.Design, setting, and participantsIn 2021, we prospectively mailed health surveys to all households in Sullivan County, a rural county with the second-worst health outcomes of all counties in New York State. Our survey included questions on demographics, medical history and the American Diabetes Association’s Pre-diabetes Risk Test.Primary outcome and methodsOur primary outcome was an assessment of diabetes burden within this rural county. To help mitigate non-response bias in our survey, raking adjustments were performed across strata of age, sex, race/ethnicity and health insurance. We analysed diabetes prevalence by demographic characteristics and used geospatial analysis to assess for clustering of diagnosed diabetes cases.ResultsAfter applying raking procedures for the 4725 survey responses, our adjusted diagnosed diabetes prevalence for Sullivan County was 12.9% compared with the 2019 Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) estimate of 8.6%. In this rural area, diagnosed diabetes prevalence was notably higher among non-Hispanic Black (21%) and Hispanic (15%) residents compared with non-Hispanic White (12%) residents. 53% of respondents without a known history of pre-diabetes or diabetes scored as high risk for pre-diabetes. Nearest neighbour analyses revealed that hotspots of diagnosed diabetes were primarily located in the more densely populated areas of this rural county.ConclusionsOur mailed health survey to all residents in Sullivan County demonstrated higher diabetes prevalence compared with modelled BRFSS estimates that were based on small telephone samples. Our results suggest the need for better diabetes surveillance in rural communities, which may benefit from interventions specifically tailored for improving glycaemic control among rural residents.