Comparison of exsanguination and hemostasis devices for Limb surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled study

Excessive intraoperative bleeding remains a challenge in limb surgeries. The exsanguination tourniquet ring has emerged as a potential solution for effective exsanguination and hemostasis. This study aims to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared to the conventional exsanguination and hemostasis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2024-08, Vol.25 (1), p.679-10, Article 679
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Jianjie, Zhao, Keqi, Xu, Shaonan, Xu, Jianqiao, Sun, Binbin, Tong, Songlin, Yao, Wangxiang, Bi, Qing, Yang, Zhengming, Zhou, Weifeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Excessive intraoperative bleeding remains a challenge in limb surgeries. The exsanguination tourniquet ring has emerged as a potential solution for effective exsanguination and hemostasis. This study aims to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared to the conventional exsanguination and hemostasis approach (pneumatic tourniquet combined with Esmarch bandage). This randomized controlled trial evaluates the exsanguination tourniquet ring's effectiveness and safety versus the conventional approach in 220 participants undergoing various limb surgeries. Allocation included experimental and control groups, assesses through efficacy (including intraoperative and total blood loss, hemoglobin levels, and exsanguination and hemostasis effectiveness) and safety (adverse event occurrence) indicators. The experimental group (n = 110) utilizes the exsanguination tourniquet ring, while the control group (n = 110) employs the conventional approach. As for intraoperative blood loss, the experimental group is non-inferior to the control group (p-value 
ISSN:1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07770-x