Assessing the phytotoxic effects of class A foam application on northern Europe tree species: a short-term study on implications for wildfire management and ecosystem health

•Species effect to fire suppressant foam application was observed.•Picea abies was impacted positively by the foam application.•Fire suppressant foam impact on tree growth and biochemistry was dose dependent.•Foam application on seeds yielded more adverse effects than on 1-year-old trees. Wildfires...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological indicators 2024-09, Vol.166, p.112393, Article 112393
Hauptverfasser: Sirgedaitė-Šėžienė, Vaida, Vaitiekūnaitė, Dorotėja, Šilanskienė, Milana, Čėsnienė, Ieva, Striganavičiūtė, Greta, Jaeger, Axel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Species effect to fire suppressant foam application was observed.•Picea abies was impacted positively by the foam application.•Fire suppressant foam impact on tree growth and biochemistry was dose dependent.•Foam application on seeds yielded more adverse effects than on 1-year-old trees. Wildfires are an ever-increasing issue due to the driving forces of climate change. Weather events that lead to higher wildfire potential are likely to increase and thus new fire management methods via more sustainable fire suppressant class A foams rather than retardants are being developed. However, despite their adherence to regulations, foam impact on targeted ecosystems, namely forests and forest trees is poorly studied. We aimed to investigate how three tree species (Pinus sylvestris, Alnus glutinosa and Picea abies) will react to a one-time class A foam application. Two separate trials were conducted. During the first the foam was applied to seeds and during the other – to 1-year-old seedlings. Tree growth and physiological status were evaluated. Stress criteria for cellular damage, non-antioxidant and antioxidant stress response and photosynthesis efficacy were measured. Results showed an obvious species effect, as all three reacted differently. The dose effect was also notable, with the higher application rate leading to a proportionally bigger response. Overall, pines were negatively impacted, spruce were positively affected, and alders didn’t experience a notable change. This leads us to conclude that pending the limitation of this experiment the tested foam while phytotoxic in some cases, is unlikely to affect tree survival rates under field conditions and any physiological responses are likely transient in nature.
ISSN:1470-160X
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112393