Minimally Invasive Distal Metatarsal Osteotomy for Juvenile Hallux Valgus Correction: A Retrospective Radiographic Evaluation

Category: Bunion; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: The minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy (MIDMO) is an increasingly popular technique for hallux valgus (HV) correction in the adult population. In juveniles, however, the use of minimally invasive methods to surgically resolve HV re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot & ankle orthopaedics 2023-12, Vol.8 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Mateen, Sara, Thomas, Michael A., Siddiqui, Yumna, McWilliam, Jim R., Siddiqui, Noman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Category: Bunion; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: The minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy (MIDMO) is an increasingly popular technique for hallux valgus (HV) correction in the adult population. In juveniles, however, the use of minimally invasive methods to surgically resolve HV remains a comparatively new and under-reported concept. The primary objectives of this retrospective review are to provide radiographic findings of pediatric patients who underwent surgical correction of HV via the minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy (MIDMO). Secondary objectives are the utilization of the mechanical axis of the first metatarsal to measure pre- and postoperative radiographic outcomes and time to osseous consolidation. Methods: A multi-center retrospective review was performed of two institution system’s records was conducted for consecutive patients who underwent surgical correction for HV between January 2012 and June 2022. Patients were included if they underwent HV correction using MIDMO, were aged < 18 years, had ≥ 3 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up, and had radiographs on file of both pre- and postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. The first IMA (anatomic and mechanical axes), hallux abductus angle (HAA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), and tibial sesamoid position (TSP) were measured in pre- and postoperative AP and lateral views. A paired sample t-test was used to compare pre- and postoperative absolute radiographic measured angles. Results were considered statistically significant at the 5% (P < 0.05) level. Results: Forty-two feet amongst 30 patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty seven were female (90%) and 3 of whom were male (10%). Temporary pin fixation (23.8%) or screw fixation (76.2%). Mean patient age was 15.2 years. Mean follow-up was 13.7 months. Mean time to osseous consolidation was 6.7 weeks. A statistically significant reduction was noted in all the radiographic values of every angle measured from preoperative to postoperative. The mean first anatomic IMA changed from 14.52° to 3.53° postoperatively and the first mechanical IMA changed from 14.24° to 4.64° postoperatively. The mean HAA was reduced from 32.98° to 12.83° postoperatively, the mean DMAA shifted from 12.40° to 2.93° postoperatively, and the mean TSP was revised from 3.60° preoperatively to 1.07° postoperatively. Conclusion: This is the first retrospective North American radiographic review in the known literatur
ISSN:2473-0114
2473-0114
DOI:10.1177/2473011423S00173