Novel Fermatean Fuzzy Aczel–Alsina Model for Investment Strategy Selection

For choosing the optimal option for multiple issues, the multiattribute decision-making (MADM) technique within a Fermatean fuzzy environment is a well-known and significant method. This paper presents a novel superiority inferiority ranking (SIR) approach for Fermatean fuzzy sets in group decision-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mathematics (Basel) 2023-07, Vol.11 (14), p.3211
Hauptverfasser: Haq, Iftikhar Ul, Shaheen, Tanzeela, Ali, Wajid, Toor, Hamza, Senapati, Tapan, Pilla, Francesco, Moslem, Sarbast
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:For choosing the optimal option for multiple issues, the multiattribute decision-making (MADM) technique within a Fermatean fuzzy environment is a well-known and significant method. This paper presents a novel superiority inferiority ranking (SIR) approach for Fermatean fuzzy sets in group decision-making using multicriteria to reduce investment risk. This approach aims to evaluate the strategies for selecting the optimal investment company. The SIR method is depicted, and its effectiveness in decision-making is explored. In this manuscript, we develop new types of Aczel–Alsina operations on the Fermatean fuzzy environment and Fermatean Fuzzy Aczel–Alsina (FF-AA) average aggregation operators, including their properties such as idempotency, monotonicity, and boundedness. Further, we introduce a Fermatean fuzzy Aczel–Alsina weighted average closeness coefficient (FF-AA-WA-CC) aggregation operator (AO) based on the closeness coefficient for MAGDM issues. By utilizing the proposed technique, we solve a numerical example of an MAGDM problem. The results show that this approach is accurate and practical, and consistent with a realistic investment circumstance. A demonstration was created to emphasize the significance and credibility of this approach and assess its validity by comparing its outcomes with the established methods.
ISSN:2227-7390
2227-7390
DOI:10.3390/math11143211