Optimization and Tradeoff Analysis for Multiple Configurations of Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage Systems in Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol Sector

Bio-energy systems with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) will be essential if countries are to meet the gas emission reduction targets established in the 2015 Paris Agreement. This study seeks to carry out a thermodynamic optimization and analysis of a BECCS technology for a typical Brazilian coge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-08, Vol.26 (8), p.698
Hauptverfasser: Bunya, Bruno, Sotomonte, César A R, Vitoriano Julio, Alisson Aparecido, Pereira, João Luiz Junho, de Souza, Túlio Augusto Zucareli, Francisco, Matheus Brendon, Coronado, Christian J R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Bio-energy systems with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) will be essential if countries are to meet the gas emission reduction targets established in the 2015 Paris Agreement. This study seeks to carry out a thermodynamic optimization and analysis of a BECCS technology for a typical Brazilian cogeneration plant. To maximize generated net electrical energy (MWe) and carbon dioxide CO capture (Mt/year), this study evaluated six cogeneration systems integrated with a chemical absorption process using MEA. A key performance indicator (gCO /kWh) was also evaluated. The set of optimal solutions shows that the single regenerator configuration (REG1) resulted in more CO capture (51.9% of all CO emissions generated by the plant), penalized by 14.9% in the electrical plant's efficiency. On the other hand, the reheated configuration with three regenerators (Reheat3) was less power-penalized (7.41%) but had a lower CO capture rate (36.3%). Results showed that if the CO capture rates would be higher than 51.9%, the cogeneration system would reach a higher specific emission (gCO /kWh) than the cogeneration base plant without a carbon capture system, which implies that low capture rates (
ISSN:1099-4300
1099-4300
DOI:10.3390/e26080698