Nationwide survey of urological specialists regarding male infertility: results from a 2015 questionnaire in Japan

Purpose To investigate the incidence, etiology, treatment indications, and outcomes regarding infertile male patients in Japan. Methods Between April, 2014 and March, 2015, the authors contacted 47 clinical specialists in male infertility who had been certified by the Japan Society for Reproductive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproductive medicine and biology 2018-01, Vol.17 (1), p.44-51
Hauptverfasser: Yumura, Yasushi, Tsujimura, Akira, Imamoto, Takashi, Umemoto, Yukihiro, Kobayashi, Hideyuki, Shiraishi, Koji, Shin, Takeshi, Taniguchi, Hisanori, Chiba, Koji, Miyagawa, Yasushi, Iwamoto, Teruaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To investigate the incidence, etiology, treatment indications, and outcomes regarding infertile male patients in Japan. Methods Between April, 2014 and March, 2015, the authors contacted 47 clinical specialists in male infertility who had been certified by the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. The participating clinicians were sent a questionnaire regarding information on their infertile patients, according to etiology and the number and success rates of male infertility operations that had been performed in their practice. Results Thirty‐nine specialists returned the questionnaire and provided information regarding 7268 patients. The etiology of infertility included testicular factors, sexual disorders, and seminal tract obstruction. During the study year, the clinicians performed varicocelectomies, testicular sperm extractions (TESEs), and re‐anastomoses of the seminal tract. The rate of successful varicocelectomies was >70%. The sperm retrieval rates with conventional TESE and microdissection TESE were 98.3% and 34.0%, respectively, while the patency rates with vasovasostomy and epididymovasostomy were 81.8% and 61.0%, respectively. Conclusion Surgical outcomes for infertile male patients are favorable and can be of great clinical benefit for infertile couples. To achieve this, urologists should work in collaboration with gynecological specialists in order to optimize the treatment of both partners.
ISSN:1445-5781
1447-0578
DOI:10.1002/rmb2.12065