Randomized controlled trial combining constraint-induced movement therapy and action-observation training in unilateral cerebral palsy: clinical effects and influencing factors of treatment response

Introduction: Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) improves upper limb (UL) motor execution in unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP). As these children also show motor planning deficits, action-observation training (AOT) might be of additional value. Here, we investigated the combined effect of AOT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders 2020-01, Vol.13, p.1756286419898065-1756286419898065
Hauptverfasser: Simon-Martinez, Cristina, Mailleux, Lisa, Hoskens, Jasmine, Ortibus, Els, Jaspers, Ellen, Wenderoth, Nicole, Sgandurra, Giuseppina, Cioni, Giovanni, Molenaers, Guy, Klingels, Katrijn, Feys, Hilde
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) improves upper limb (UL) motor execution in unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP). As these children also show motor planning deficits, action-observation training (AOT) might be of additional value. Here, we investigated the combined effect of AOT to CIMT and identified factors influencing treatment response. Methods: A total of 44 children with uCP (mean 9 years 6 months, SD 1 year 10 months) participated in a 9-day camp wearing a splint for 6 h/day and were allocated to the CIMT + AOT (n = 22) and the CIMT + placebo group (n = 22). The CIMT + AOT group received 15 h of AOT (i.e. video-observation) and executed the observed tasks, whilst the CIMT + AOT group watched videos free of biological motion and executed the same tasks. The primary outcome measure was bimanual performance. Secondary outcomes included measures of body function and activity level assessed before (T1), after the intervention (T2), and at 6 months follow-up (T3). Influencing factors included behavioural and neurological characteristics. Results: Although no between-groups differences were found (p > 0.05; η2 = 0–16), the addition of AOT led to higher gains in children with initially poorer bimanual performance (p = 0.02; η2 = 0.14). Both groups improved in all outcome measures after the intervention and retained the gains at follow up (p 
ISSN:1756-2864
1756-2856
1756-2864
DOI:10.1177/1756286419898065