Safety and feasibility of mini-open Wiltse approach in posterolateral lumbar stabilization and fusion: intra- and post-operative evaluation

Background Expected operative challenges in minimally invasive spine surgeries as a result of restricted surgical field, unfamiliarity with surgical approaches and fear of complications are behind the preference of using traditional "open" spine surgery. Objectives To evaluate the safety a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery 2024-12, Vol.39 (1), p.31-9, Article 31
Hauptverfasser: Elkholy, Hany, Elnoamany, Hossam, Hussein, Mohamed Adel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Expected operative challenges in minimally invasive spine surgeries as a result of restricted surgical field, unfamiliarity with surgical approaches and fear of complications are behind the preference of using traditional "open" spine surgery. Objectives To evaluate the safety and feasibility of mini-open Wiltse approach in comparison with the conventional midline approach for posterolateral lumbar stabilization and fusion. Patients and methods A retrospective comparative study conducted on 49 patients with low grade single level lumbar spondylolithesis who were surgically treated in our Department between May 2020 and May 2022. Patients who were surgically treated with traditional midline approach were included in group (A) and patients in whom the mini-open Wiltse approach was used, were assigned to group (B). The two groups were compared regarding various intra and postoperative parameters. Results Group (A) included 27 patients (55.1%) operated upon with the classic midline approach and 22 patients (44.9%) were surgically treated using the Wiltse approach (group B). The mean patients' age (50.43 ± 5.538) years and L4-5 was the most commonly affected level (71.4%). The intra-operative parameters (operation time, blood loss and fluoroscopy time) showed significant lower results (P 
ISSN:2520-8225
2520-8225
DOI:10.1186/s41984-024-00301-9