Effect of landscape irrigation regulations on runoff volume from low-density residential catchments during two California droughts

The severe drought in California (2012–2016) generated significant public and government concern. State and local watering regulations were enacted to reduce residential and commercial water-use during the droughts. This study presents a comparison of residential runoff volumes before and after local landscape irrigation regulations were enacted during the droughts of 2008 and 2012–2016. Each sampling site (Folsom 1 and Folsom 2) was a storm drain outfall that drained a low-density residential catchment in the City of Folsom. Dry season runoff measured at the sampling sites represents neighborhood outdoor water waste, mainly from landscape irrigation. During the drought of 2012–2016, median runoff flows were significantly reduced after local landscape irrigation regulations were enacted. The daily runoff pattern was also highly influenced by regulation, with reductions of daily peak runoff flows on 4–5 days in a week after watering regulations were enacted. The number of peak flow events in the daily runoff pattern were reduced during this period. In addition, a significant reduction in mean runoff volume occurred. Based on these results, the watering regulations enacted by the City of Folsom had a positive effect on reducing urban runoff from residential neighborhoods during the dry season. As the results are from monitoring sites in a relatively small geographical area, further work should evaluate reductions in irrigation runoff from other California locations to determine if this is a localized phenomenon. •During short-term drought, irrigation regulations resulted in reductions in runoff.•Dry season runoff declined during long-term drought without irrigation regulations.•Irrigation regulations produced more reduction in runoff during long-term drought.•Runoff magnitude and frequency decreased after irrigation regulations were enacted.