Clinical outcome measures and their evidence base in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review to inform a core measurement set (AO Spine RECODE-DCM)

ObjectivesTo evaluate the measurement properties of outcome measures currently used in the assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) for clinical research.DesignSystematic reviewData sourcesMEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through 4 August 2020.Eligibility criteriaPrimary clinical researc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e057650-e057650
Hauptverfasser: Yanez Touzet, Alvaro, Bhatti, Aniqah, Dohle, Esmee, Bhatti, Faheem, Lee, Keng Siang, Furlan, Julio C, Fehlings, Michael G, Harrop, James S, Zipser, Carl Moritz, Rodrigues-Pinto, Ricardo, Milligan, James, Sarewitz, Ellen, Curt, Armin, Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa, Aarabi, Bizhan, Boerger, Timothy F, Tetreault, Lindsay, Chen, Robert, Guest, James D, Kalsi-Ryan, Sukhvinder, McNair, Angus GK, Kotter, Mark, Davies, Benjamin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesTo evaluate the measurement properties of outcome measures currently used in the assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) for clinical research.DesignSystematic reviewData sourcesMEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through 4 August 2020.Eligibility criteriaPrimary clinical research published in English and whose primary purpose was to evaluate the measurement properties or clinically important differences of instruments used in DCM.Data extraction and synthesisPsychometric properties and clinically important differences were both extracted from each study, assessed for risk of bias and presented in accordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments criteria.ResultsTwenty-nine outcome instruments were identified from 52 studies published between 1999 and 2020. They measured neuromuscular function (16 instruments), life impact (five instruments), pain (five instruments) and radiological scoring (five instruments). No instrument had evaluations for all 10 measurement properties and
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057650