Efficiency of Cisplatin Based Concurrent Chemoradiation in Stages III & IV Head & Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective: To determine the response of cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation in stages III and IV head & neck squamous cell cancer and to evaluate frequency of common toxicities. Introduction: Almost 70% of head and neck cancer patients present with locally advanced disease (stage III and I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences 2016-08, Vol.10 (2), p.59-64
Hauptverfasser: Begum, Kulsoom, Naqvi, Syeda Uzma, Ahmed, Akhtar, Maqbool, Syed Amir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To determine the response of cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation in stages III and IV head & neck squamous cell cancer and to evaluate frequency of common toxicities. Introduction: Almost 70% of head and neck cancer patients present with locally advanced disease (stage III and IV). Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the current standard treatment. Cytotoxic cisplatin is the treatment of choice for concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Cisplatin acts as a radiation sensitizer and advances the antitumor efficacy when combined with radiotherapy. Likewise all chemotherapeutic agents also show side effects including mucositis, dermatitis, nausea & diarrhea. Materials & Methods: A descriptive study conducted in Department of Radiotherapy, Karachi Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine from 2010 to 2011. Fractions with 2 Gy per fraction were completed in 7 weeks. Sample size of 85 enrolled. Total dose of radiotherapy was 66 Gy in 33 fractions. Cisplatin of 100 mg /m² on day 1, 22 and 43 were given. Treatment response was determined radiologically at four weeks. Toxicity was assessed weekly during treatment. Results: Mean age was 55.4 (±10.5) years with Male to Female ratio was 1.3: 1. Thirty (41.1%) patients had achieved complete response (CR), 36 (49.3%) patients had partial response (PR). Significant response rate was 90.4%. p-value was significant
ISSN:1995-2198
2410-2180
DOI:10.36570/jduhs.2016.2.458