Randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes of video capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Optimal management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) remains unclear. To evaluate diagnostic yields and downstream clinical outcomes comparing video capsule endoscopy (VCE) with push enteroscopy (PE). Patients with OGIB and negative esophagogastroduodenoscopies and colonoscopies were rando...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 2015-03, Vol.29 (2), p.85-90
Hauptverfasser: Segarajasingam, Dev S, Hanley, Stephen C, Barkun, Alan N, Waschke, Kevin A, Burtin, Pascal, Parent, Josée, Mayrand, Serge, Fallone, Carlo A, Jobin, Gilles, Seidman, Ernest G, Martel, Myriam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Optimal management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) remains unclear. To evaluate diagnostic yields and downstream clinical outcomes comparing video capsule endoscopy (VCE) with push enteroscopy (PE). Patients with OGIB and negative esophagogastroduodenoscopies and colonoscopies were randomly assigned to VCE or PE and followed for 12 months. End points included diagnostic yield, acute or chronic bleeding, health resource utilization and crossovers. Data from 79 patients were analyzed (VCE n=40; PE n=39; 82.3% overt OGIB). VCE had greater diagnostic yield (72.5% versus 48.7%; P
ISSN:2291-2789
2291-2797
DOI:10.1155/2015/897567