P2.04: Assessment of Brachial Artery Reactivity using the Endocheck: Repeatability, Reproducibility and Preliminary Comparison with Ultrasound

Objective The Endocheck, embedded within the Vicorder device, uses cuffbased, pulse volume (PV) displacement to record brachial PV waveforms at baseline, and during reactive hyperaemia. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of the Endocheck method. Methods The study consisted of two parts....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Artery research 2013, Vol.7 (3-4), p.119-120
Hauptverfasser: Day, L. M., Maki-Petaja, K. M., Wilkinson, I. B., McEniery, C. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The Endocheck, embedded within the Vicorder device, uses cuffbased, pulse volume (PV) displacement to record brachial PV waveforms at baseline, and during reactive hyperaemia. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of the Endocheck method. Methods The study consisted of two parts. Part 1: Healthy volunteers (n=9) were studied twice, separated by 24hours. Each visit consisted of two studies, 30min apart, where, after 10min supine rest, brachial BP was assessed and PV waveforms recorded for 10sec (baseline). A cuff placed distally around the forearm was then inflated to 200mmHg for 5min. Following cuff-release, PV waveforms were recorded for 3min. The square root of the ratio of peak:baseline PV during hyperaemia (√V2/V1) was calculated. Part 2: Healthy volunteers (n=16) were studied once. Brachial artery responses were assessed simultaneously in both arms, using ultrasound (right arm) and Endocheck (left arm), following a similar protocol as above. Results Part 1: An average change in PV of 74±82% was detected in response to forearm ischaemia (P=0.003). Within-visit repeatability was acceptable, with a mean (±SD) difference in √V2/V1 of 0.03±0.25 (P=0.6), and a high correlation between studies (r=0.64; P=0.004). Between-visit reproducibility was high, with a mean difference of 0.004±0.17 (P=0.9) and a strong correlation between readings (r=0.81; P
ISSN:1872-9312
1876-4401
1876-4401
DOI:10.1016/j.artres.2013.10.066