Assessment of Google Glass for Photographic Documentation in Veterinary Forensic Pathology: Usability Study

Google Glass is a head-mounted device designed in the shape of a pair of eyeglasses equipped with a 5.0-megapixel integrated camera and capable of taking pictures with simple voice commands. The objective of our study was to determine whether Google Glass is fit for veterinary forensic pathology pur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e180-e180
Hauptverfasser: Piegari, Giuseppe, Iovane, Valentina, Carletti, Vincenzo, Fico, Rosario, Costagliola, Alessandro, De Biase, Davide, Prisco, Francesco, Paciello, Orlando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Google Glass is a head-mounted device designed in the shape of a pair of eyeglasses equipped with a 5.0-megapixel integrated camera and capable of taking pictures with simple voice commands. The objective of our study was to determine whether Google Glass is fit for veterinary forensic pathology purposes. A total of 44 forensic necropsies of 2 different species (22 dogs and 22 cats) were performed by 2 pathologists; each pathologist conducted 11 necropsies of each species and, for each photographic acquisition, the images were taken with a Google Glass device and a Nikon D3200 digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera. The pictures were collected, divided into 3 groups (based on the external appearance of the animal, organs, and anatomical details), and evaluated by 5 forensic pathologists using a 5-point score system. The parameters assessed were overall color settings, region of interest, sharpness, and brightness. To evaluate the difference in mean duration between necropsies conduced with Google Glass and DSLR camera and to assess the battery consumption of the devices, an additional number of 16 necropsies were performed by the 2 pathologists. In these cases, Google Glass was used for photographic reports in 8 cases (4 dogs and 4 cats) and a Nikon D3200 reflex camera in the other 8 cases. Statistical evaluations were performed to assess the differences in ratings between the quality of the images taken with both devices. The images taken with Google Glass received significantly lower ratings than those acquired with reflex camera for all 4 assessed parameters (P
ISSN:2291-5222
2291-5222
DOI:10.2196/mhealth.9975